I heard you Barack, forget Nature and colour schemes

When world leaders gather at a funeral I always get a feeling of unease. Maybe I am just too sceptical but I can't help wonder if they attend because they want to pay their respect to the deceased or because they want to bask in the shine and glory the deceased has left. Looking at how respectful world leaders were by posting selfies on twitter during Mandela's memorial service I get the impression they are there for the second reason, not for the first.
Also it is striking that in all speeches I heard during the service not a single one apologised to Mandela and the South Africans. Apologise? Yes indeed apologise. UK and US supported Apartheid until just before Mandela was released. CIA helped jail Mandela  in 1962. UK and US put Mandela on their terrorist list. The US kept him on the terrorist list until 2008!
Also I heard Obama say following:
"There are too many of us who happily embrace Madiba's legacy of racial reconciliation, but passionately resist even modest reforms that would challenge chronic poverty and growing inequality.
There are too many leaders who claim solidarity with Madiba's struggle for freedom, but do not tolerate dissent from their own people. And there are too many of us who stand on the sidelines, comfortable in complacency or cynicism when our voices must be heard."

I heard you Barack. You want a place in history books? Then go and really do what you preach and maybe the world will become a better place in some parts of the world.

In the mean time lets listen to N'Kosi Sikeleli, South African's national anthem in a a-typical but very good and powerful version by Perpetuum Jazzile:

The Nobel price winners received their price on the same day as the Mandela memorial so that news got a bit snowed under. There is one article that I recommend reading because Randy Schekman (winner of the Nobel price for medicine) declared he will no longer send papers to the top scientific magazines. Why? Because: "Leading academic journals are distorting the scientific process and represent a "tyranny" that must be broken. Schekman said pressure to publish in "luxury" journals encouraged researchers to cut corners and pursue trendy fields of science instead of doing more important work. The problem was exacerbated, he said, by editors who were not active scientists but professionals who favoured studies that were likely to make a splash."
You can read the full article here.

Talking to a pilot this week, he told me he got on an Alpha Jet flight. Blimey! I would love to have a go as well. It reminded me of the lively colour schemes that our Belgian Airforce came up with every year before the start of the airshow season. Ok, granted, not all were works of art, but colourful they were. Below a selection of the schemes between 1989 and 1994.

The best Belgian colourscheme ever was not on an Alpha Jet but on a Belgian Air Force Mirage V. I shot below picture in Bierset (then still partly a military airfield) of BR15 in the celebration scheme for 70 Years of the 42nd Squadron Mephisto. What a beauty!

Not a chaotic combination at all and entertaining birds

I had some spare time this week so I took the opportunity to catch up with my reading. I recently, after a one year search, acquired a copy of the book: ‘The Edge of Chaos’ written by M. Waldrop. It’s a thrilling story about the brilliant (Nobel-prize winning) minds at the Santa Fe institute (in the late 80s early 90s) who discovered how the world adapts itself to a state of continuous renewal on the edge of chaos. In fact, life can only thrive on this thin edge. The word ‘world’ you can interpret as biology, physics, evolution, chemistry, nature, climate, economy (aha!)… In one sentence: how life develops into ever more complexity floating on the edge of chaos. From only a couple of basic and simple rules, complex behaviour emerges and this behaviour stabilises under the right conditions to a limited number of steady states. Let me give you some examples from the book:

• a water molecule is very simple: one oxygen bound to two hydrogens. Nothing spectacular, but throw some trllions of them together and what you get is emergent properties (properties that a single entity does not have but a group of entities do). Water is fluid, or turns into ice below 0°C or becomes vapour above 100°C. When boiling water, the convection bubbles are purely chaotic.
• or how people in the Middle Ages were able to build cathedrals using only some basic heuristics as they did not have the knowledge to perform stress calculations. Still catherdrals are wonderfully complex and have stood the test of time. Compare this to today's buidlings and structures calculated up to 5 digits behind the comma.
• or chess: from a limited number of rules, there are 10^120 different moves. In case you have trouble picturing this number (a 1 with 120 zeros), if you would make one move every microsecond since the Big Bang, you would only have scratched the surface of the 10^120 combinations by now.
• or boids, the simulated computer equivalent of birds that are programmed with 3 simple rules but behave like a flock of birds and have no problem avoiding objects, just like a real flock of say starlings. The three simple rules are: keep an as small as possible distance to other objects in the surrounding, including other boids; keep the speed equal to the speed of other boids around; try getting closer to the center of the group. Compare the computer simulation with a video of a falcon diving on a swarm of starlings. Isn't life (and science!) wonderful?

It all also links in with the fact that history does not flow but that it jumps (see Taleb et al), with "The Tipping Point" (Malcolm Gladwell), with "Thinking Fast and Slow" (Daniel Kahneman) and of course with "Chaos" (James Gleick). But back to ‘The Edge of Chaos’, finally I read a book confirming my feeling there is something wrong with the term 'sustainability' (I never liked it)! I always felt that sustainability does not exist otherwise dinosaurs would still be around. Maybe a harsh picture but so it seems, rather accurate.

Not a chaotic combination at all.

In between the reading, birds kept me entertained (no it's not what you think you dirty minds, I'm talking about our feathered friends). Mocking birds were picking up walnuts, flying high in the sky and dropping hem on the terras and street to break them. Blackbirds and buzzards were doing dogfights (with spectaular wingovers and barrel rolls). And a black redtail took his daily bath in the bird water tub. Ah Autumn can be so wonderful!

We don't have a clue, the Ten Commandments and a birthday present for me (please!)

Now that the weeks of Nobel-prize winning announcements are over, we can do a little evaluation. The Peace-prize was given to an organisation that not many knew before, a Belgian (François Englert) shared the prize for physics together with Peter Higgs, but the prize that raised many eyebrows was the one for economy. First of all, this isn't a real Nobel prize anyway as it is awarded by the Swedish Central Bank and not by the Nobel Committee.Only physics, chemistry, medicine, literature and peace were named as official prizes in Nobel's testament. Since 1968 the Swedish Central Bank prize for economy in commemoration of Alfred Nobel was instituted. So actually it is the odd one out and shouldn't actually be part of the Nobel prize-list anyway. Economy is not art (like literature), does not serve mankind (like working for piece) and it definitely is not a science. This year the economy prize went to Eugene Fama, Lars Peter Hansen and Robert Shiller. Summarising why those three won it could be done like this:

• Fama proved that "the value of shares are not predictable (in the short term) and do a random walk"
• Shiller proved that  "the value of shares is predictable on the long term"
• Hansen is an econometrist who found some complicated way how to "estimate  population parameters by equating sample moments with unobservable population moments and from that estimate the quantities..." (yes I know... I read this as "if you don't know the defining parameters of a population, you estimate some of these parameters and then calculate the quantities". Not helpful either? Let's just say if you don't know what you are looking at, you estimate what it is and from that estimation you then calculate it. Or even simpler: a statistical method to measure Fama and Shillers theory against the real prices).

But next to that hocus pocus, I think the real message behind awarding those three with the prize of the Swedish Central Bank is: "about economy - well... we don't have a clue either". It's about time someone finally admits economy is not a science. I would have preferred if the Swedish Central Bank would have just bluntly stated this and abolished their prize. Alfred Nobel would rest in piece again if they did. After all, they got it spectacularly wrong in the past. In 1997 Merton-Scholes got awarded the prize because they found a formula to put a price on options. They started their own hedge fund in 1994 using their self invented formulas, received the Nobel prize in 1997 and went spectacularly bust in ... 1998 loosing 2,3 billion $ in 3 weeks for a total of 4,6 billion $ loss.


Former Nobel peace-prize winners met this week and Lech Walesa came up with an inspiring proposal. He said we should make a new version of the Ten Commandments that would be accepted by all cultures, nations and religions: "We need to agree on common values for all religions as soon as possible, a kind of secular Ten Commandments on which we will build the world of tomorrow." That's the kind of idea that stimulates my mind! At first sight one might say that Mr Walesa is a bit too ambitious, that it is impossible for everyone to agree on ten basic rules. On the other hand, we are all human and irrespective of our culture, religion or political system, we all experience the same emotions that make us tick. In his speech Mr Walesa stated that besides universal values, the international community needs to focus on the economy of tomorrow, which definitely should not be based on communism nor on capitalism as we have it today. He is definitely right about this!
I am not going to post the Ten Commandments Moses brought back from the mountain, let's do this exercise with an open mind. the floor is yours.

Picture AFP

My birthday is coming up next moth and for those of you who are still desperately looking for a nice birthday gift, please have a look at this website: http://www.rmauctions.com/lots/?SaleCode=NY13&feature=0&sort=lot The 1966 Jaguar E-Type or 1956 Aston Martin DB2/4 MkII would be highly appreciated. I'll show you my eternal gratitude by taking you for a spin!

Pictures courtesy of RM Auctions